From each of the furniture objects, the chair might be primary. While many other pieces (save for the bed) are intended to support objects, the chair supports our human form. The term chair was said here in the wider sense, from stool to throne to developed chairs like a bench and sofa, which should be regarded as extended or connected chairs, and whose character (i.e., whether they are intended for sitting or reclining) is not obviously defined.
The social history of the chair is as interesting as its history as a creative craft. The chair is not only a physical support or aesthetic object; it historically is a symbol of social standing. Within the old royal courts there were plain differences between sitting on a chair with arms, or a chair with a back but no arms, or having to cope with a stool. In the last century, the director’s and/or manager’s chair has been a symbol of superior position, like in democratic parliaments the speaker sits on a raised level.
In its furniture form, the chair is utilised for a wealth of various makes. There are chairs designed to suit man’s age and physical abilities (the high chair, the wheelchair) and to denote his position in society (the executive chair, the throne). During past times there were chairs for birthing (birth chairs); since the 20th century, there have been chairs for ending life (the electric chair). We design chairs with one, two, three, and/or four legs, chairs with or without arms, and chairs with or without backs. We have chairs that can be folded and put away, chairs on wheels, and chairs on runners.
Modern living has demanded particular chairs for automobiles and aircraft. Each and every one of these chair kinds have been perfected to conform to differing human uses. For its unique importance with man, the chair comes to its full purpose only when used. Whereas it makes no difference to one’s appreciation of a cupboard or a chest of drawers if there might be anything inside or not, a chair is understood and evaluated by a person sitting in it, for chair and sitter need each other. Thus the individual areas of a chair are named like the names of the human form: arms, legs, feet, back, and seat.
Because the elementary purpose of a chair is to support the body, its credit is valued primarily from how completely it does fulfill this practical job. In the structure of a chair, the carpenter is restricted with certain static rules and principal measurements. Within these boundaries, however, the chair builder has large freedom.
The history of the chair covered a period of several thousand years. There were civilizations that have created iconic chair shapes, expressive of the leading object in the areas of technique and aesthetics. Out of those peoples, particular mention can be made of ancient Egypt and Greece; China; Spain and The Netherlands in the 17th century; England in the 18th century; and France in the 18th century during the lives of Louis XV and Louis XVI.
Egypt
Two ancient Egyptian chair forms, both the items of masterful design, are now known from tomb discoveries. The first of these is a four-legged chair with a back, the other a folding stool. The classical Egyptian chair would have had four legs shaped akin to those of a particular animal, a curved seat, leading to a sloping back supported by vertical stretchers. From this a durable triangular construction was made. There was from our knowledge no noteworthy variation between the construction of Egyptian thrones and chairs for typical people. The only variation lies in the intricacy of its ornamentation, in the choice of more valuable inlays. The Egyptian folding stool likely was developed for an easily carried seat for army soldiers. As a camp stool the stool stayed til much later periods. But the stool then was designed as the character of a ceremonial seat, its original function as a folding stool neglected or forgotten. This can from evidence be found, from as early as 1366–57 BC in two stools, formed in ebony with ivory inlay decoration and gold mounts, from the tomb of Tutankhamen. They were in the structure of folding stools but can’t be folded because the seats were formed out of wood. The simple structure of the folding stool, being of two frames that cycle on metal bolts and support a seat of leather or fabric secured between them, came again at some time later during the Bronze Age folding chairs of Scandinavia and northern Germany. The most well known of those is the folding stool, from ashwood, which can now be found at Guldhøj (National Museum in Copenhagen).
Greece and Rome
The significant Greek chair, the klismos, is recognised not from any ancient specimen still around but found in a variety of pictorial material. The better known is the klismos placed on the Hegeso Stele at the Dipylon burial area just out of Athens (c. 410 BC). This klismos is a chair that had a backward-sloping, curved backboard and four curving legs, but only two of which can be seen. These unusual legs were most likely to be manufactured with bent wood and were as such had to bear a large amount of pressure with the weight of the sitter. The joints fastening the legs to the frame of the seat were therefore super solid and were overtly signified.
The Romans borrowed from the Greek chair; quite a few casts of seated Romans display examples of a heavier and in appearance rather less delicately designed klismos. Both types, the light and the heavy, were popularised within the Classicist era. The klismos design is found in French Empire styles, in English Regency, and in particular brands of profound individuality in Denmark and Sweden circa 1800.
China
The past of the chair in China cannot be followed as far back as the history of chairs in Egypt and Greece. Since the Tang dynasty (AD 618–907) an unbroken collection of images and works of art has been kept, with images of the insides and outside of Chinese houses and the designs of furniture. Kept also of the 16th century are a number of chairs crafted of wood or lacquered wood, that possess an astonishing resemblance to pictures of previous chairs.
Like in Egypt, there were two fundamental chair forms in China: a chair of four legs and a folding stool. This chair can be designed both with and without arms but never missing the square seat and straight stiles (standing side supports) to hold up the back. In one kind, it has been found, the stiles are slightly curved above the arms to sit right with the form of the S-shaped back splat (the basic upright of a back). Together, all three parts were mortised in the yoke-like top rail. Though the innovation of the back splat had a foundation for English chairs during the Queen Anne period, wooden pieces that merely to a limited ability stabilise corner joints (and were loose to top it off) indicate a signature exclusive to Chinese chairs. The four legs sit through the seat frame, which ends over the rounded staves. Each member is round in section or has rounded edges—an acknowledgement maybe to the bamboo tradition. The seat is uncomfortable and may have a plaited bottom. These chairs demanded of the sitter to be stiff and upright; for if too much pressure is pushed on the back, the chair has a tendency to topple. In patriarchal Chinese households of this era armchairs likely were kept only for elderly individuals, for they were greatly respected.
The Chinese folding stool is believed to have travelled to China from the West. It is not dissimilar so very much from the Egyptian and Scandinavian folding stools, but it possesses a dissimilarity in that the top rail is prettily fixed to the two legs of the stool by a curved member, which is usually designed with metal mounts. From a Western point of view the ultimate effect of both these furniture designs is stylized. The structure and decoration issues are combined in a way that is both naïve and refined. The patched up appearance is an outcome of the way that the individual members do not seem to have been affixed by use of either glue or screws, but are mortised into one another and locked into position in the manner of a Chinese puzzle.
Spain: 17th century
The Golden Age of Spain during the 17th century also left its mark on the chair. Works of art display a type of chair with a relatively brusque wooden frame; a back and seat, nailed on, possessing two layers of leather, with horsehair stuffing in between the layers, stitched to show up a pattern of tiny pads. The front board and a corresponding board from the back could be folded after loosening some little iron hooks. Therefore the chair was a portable piece of furniture when traveling which, in the same time, had the dignity of a four-legged, high-backed armchair.
The Netherlands: 17th century
A low, square, upholstered type of chair is seen in engravings of the inside of rich Dutch homes by Abraham Bosse, a French artist, and also in paintings by the Dutch artists Johannes Vermeer and Gerard Terborch. While this design of chair may also be found in countries in which Dutch styles of interior decoration and Dutch furniture won preference, it is not held that the innovation actually originated in The Netherlands. Normally, the legs of the chair were smooth, round in section, and of slim dimensions; they are occasionally baluster-shaped (vase-shaped) or twisted. It is patently a bourgeois piece of furniture and was crafted in impressive amounts, as evidenced from one of Abraham Bosse’s engravings, in which an entire row of these chairs lined up along a wall. The form asserts itself with its shapely proportions and fine upholstery in gilt leather or fabric framed with fringes.
France and England: 17th and 18th centuries
The French Rococo chair in its most mature form—that was, to say, as developed in Paris around 1750—disseminated through most of Europe and was imitated or copied into the mid-20th century. The style owes its popularity to a combination of relaxation and charm. The seat conforms to the human body and allows a relaxed sitting position. The back is bow-shaped, the legs curved. Generally the seat and back are upholstered, and there are little upholstered pads covering the armrests. Smooth transitions made between seat frame, legs, and back conceal all the joints, which are solidly constructed on craftsmanlike methodology in spite of the absence of stretchers between the legs.
French Rococo chairs and imitations of those have wood of fairly thick density; but all the members are deeply molded, all extra wood has been cut away, and finer designs might be further embellished with very delicate and decorative carving. The wood may be varnished, stained, painted, or gilded. Silk damask or tapestry might be used for all of the upholstery on the seat, back, and armrests; cane is occasionally used in place of upholstery.
English chairs of the 18th century were more open in form than the French. The French manner for stylistic uniformity, which lead from the royal circles in Paris and Versailles throughout most of France and became the favourite in large parts of the Continent, had no parallel in England. Prior to 1740, the most commonly used wood was walnut; thereafter, and for the rest of the century, it was mahogany. Walnut, though beautiful in hue, was soft and therefore less suited to wood carving than to rounded, curving forms. Outer surfaces, such as the back and seat frame, were usually veneered. During the walnut period, highly overstuffed armchairs, covered with leather or embroidered material, were also developed. The best upholstery of this period is precisely and firmly modelled and accentuated by braiding or tacks. When imports of mahogany became common, no specifically new chair designs appeared, but the character of the woodwork changed. Mahogany, having a firmer, closer grain, could be cut thinner, which meant that individual parts of the chair could be more slender in shape. Mahogany also lent itself better to carving than walnut. Carving was concentrated more on the arms and back than on the legs, which as a rule were straight and smooth with chamfered (bevelled) edges and molding. There was a wealth of variety in chairback designs, featuring elegant, pierced, vase-shaped splats or two upright posts connected by horizontal slats (ladderback).
Alongside the French Rococo chair and the best English chairs in walnut and mahogany, the stick-back chair was relatively unaffected by the stylistic changes of the day. Originally a medieval form, known, for example, from paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and still found in mid-20th century in the churches and inns of southern Europe, the stick-back chair (in all of its variations) consists basically of a solid, saddle-shaped seat into which the legs, back staves, and possibly the armrests are directly mortised. This typically peasant form underwent a renewal and a process of refinement in England and America during the 18th century. Under the name Windsor chair (a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 1731) or Philadelphia chair, it became popular and was widely distributed throughout the world.
Late 18th to 20th century
During the Neoclassical period, no basic changes took place in chair forms, but legs became straight and dimensions lighter. Backs in the shape of classical vases replaced the fanciful outlines of the Rococo period. Around 1800, freely executed imitations of Greek and Roman chairs of the klismos type, with curved legs and backrest, appeared. French chairs of the Empire period, executed in dark mahogany and embellished with ornate bronze mounts, created a ponderous effect.
In cheaper styles of inferior workmanship, bourgeois chairs of the 19th century carried on the traditions of the 17th and 18th centuries. The only real innovations were the bentwood (wood that has been bent and shaped) chairs in beech that became popular all over the world and were still made in the 20th century. Around 1900 the continental Art Nouveau and Jugendstil styles (French and German styles characterized by organic foliate forms, sinuous lines, and non-geometric forms), and the Arts and Crafts movement in England (established by the English poet and decorator William Morris to reintroduce idealized standards of medieval craftsmanship), gave rise to original chair designs by Eugène Gaillard in France, Henry van de Velde in Belgium, Josef Hoffman in Austria, Antonio Gaudí in Spain, and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Scotland. These new furniture styles did not exercise wide, let alone decisive, influence. The Art Nouveau chairs designed by the French architect Hector Guimard, for example, are collector’s pieces, but his name is known to a broader public only because of his fanciful entrances to the Paris Métro.
Modern
After World War I, the Bauhaus school in Germany became a creative centre for revolutionary thinking, resulting, for example, in tubular steel chairs designed by the architects Marcel Breuer, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and others. During World War II, the aircraft industry accelerated the development of laminated wood and molded plastic furniture. The dominant chair forms of this period go back to designs by Alvar Aalto, Bruno Mathsson, and Charles and Ray Eames. Rapid technical developments, in conjunction with an ever-increasing interest in human-factors engineering, or ergonomics, suggest that completely new chair forms will probably be evolved in the future.
For a great deal on office furniture in Melbourne contact Fast Office Furniture today and check our specials.
Sphere: Related Content